What the Republicans should have ran on
Why Republicans chose to run on national security as opposed to the economy and judges is beyond me. The Republicans could have ran a positive campaign instead of the one they ran and which will probably result in the loss of the House and 3-6 Senate Seats.
See http://travel2.nytimes.com/2006/10/24/business/24econ.html
The money quote is:
“I don’t know of another election cycle in which the economy was so good, yet the election prospects for the incumbent party looked so bad,” said Frank Luntz, a Republican strategist. “If something goes wrong, Republicans are to blame. If something goes right, Republicans don’t get credit.”
Some more good economic news http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15543862/?GT1=8618
See http://travel2.nytimes.com/2006/10/24/business/24econ.html
The money quote is:
“I don’t know of another election cycle in which the economy was so good, yet the election prospects for the incumbent party looked so bad,” said Frank Luntz, a Republican strategist. “If something goes wrong, Republicans are to blame. If something goes right, Republicans don’t get credit.”
Some more good economic news http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15543862/?GT1=8618
posted by The partisan moderate at 11:53 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home